Prior to actually reading Twilight, I had an opinion about it. I scoffed and mocked. I argued with my sister that, No, no, Edward doesn’t sound like the perfect guy, because I don’t really think that breaking into the bedrooms of teenage girls without their knowledge is romantic. I maintained a generalized position that Bella and Edward’s relationship seemed psychologically unhealthy. Also, the idea of a sparkling vampire was too ridiculous not to mock. Yet, I never felt like I had the authority to really trash the book(s), because I didn’t read them, and I try to avoid being a jackass. Then it seemed like Twilight was everywhere with the upcoming release of Eclipse in theatres, so I decided to earn my Twilight badge and read it.
I fully admit I was prejudiced. I expected to be mildly offended by the content. Even so, I took for granted that it would be a good book because of how wildly popular the series is. Surely, an author doesn’t sell millions of copies without writing well! I was wrong. I was so wrong. I have not read a book so poorly crafted that wasn’t the construction paper publication of a child.
Convinced that I must be missing something, I soldiered on. I was caught in an avalanche of litter-ature. I read New Moon, then Eclipse, then Breaking Dawn, and what-the-hell-might-as-well The Short Second Life of Bree Tanner in a futile attempt to uncover the appeal. I never found it. Instead, I found a lot of disgust and disappointment, which eventually manifested into this tumblr.
I’ve been asked why I’m spending so much time mulling over something I hate so much. Here are a few reasons for Reasoning:
If you want to send me a message, the best way to ensure getting a reply will be to contact me via reasoningwithvampires@gmail.com.
With the exception of the very first post, all text from Twilight has not been re-typed or altered. These images are actual scanned pages from a copy of Twilight (ISBN-10 for this edition is 0-316-01584-9). I believe the intent of this project falls under Fair Use, specifically as the court held in Folsom v. Marsh: “[A] reviewer may fairly cite largely from the original work, if his design be really and truly to use the passages for the purposes of fair and reasonable criticism.”